Car Deal Canada

Most Unsafe Vehicles in Canada

Photo of a skeleton in a car driving in a unsafe vehicle and on the phone.

Canada, with its vast landscapes and diverse climate conditions, demands a lot from its vehicles. For many Canadians, safety stands at the forefront of criteria when selecting a car, given the challenges presented by icy roads, heavy rain, or dense urban traffic. While numerous vehicles have earned commendations for their safety features, there are some that have unfortunately found themselves on the other end of the spectrum.

Let’s delve into ten vehicles that had concerning safety ratings or reviews, based on various industry-standard assessments.

Get Pre-Qualified in Under 60 Seconds

All Credit Approved and 0 Money Down Options Available

 

1. Chevrolet Spark

The Chevy Spark, while charming in its compactness, has faced criticism due to its performance in collision tests. Specifically, it has previously earned a lower rating in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) small overlap front test. The small structure and lightweight nature can also put it at a disadvantage in collisions with larger vehicles.

 

2. Fiat 500

Aesthetically pleasing with a retro flair, the Fiat 500 unfortunately didn’t score as impressively in some safety tests. Older models, in particular, faced challenges with side crashworthiness and small overlap front test performance.

 

3. Toyota Tundra

A surprise to many, this powerhouse truck has had its safety debated. Earlier models faced scrutiny due to lower scores in the IIHS roof strength test, raising concerns about the potential risk of rollovers.

 

4. Nissan Versa

This popular subcompact sedan, often chosen for urban commutes, had some of its versions receive less-than-stellar ratings in frontal crash tests, especially in the small overlap front test.

 

5. Jeep Wrangler

While the Jeep Wrangler is touted as a rugged off-roader, its design and lack of some modern safety features have led to critiques. In certain tests, it showed a higher risk for rollovers compared to other SUVs.

 

6. Mitsubishi Mirage

Another entry in the compact category, the Mirage, has faced criticism for its performance in crash tests, particularly frontal crashes. It’s essential to cross-check its safety ratings, especially if you’re considering older models.

 

7. Dodge Journey

The Journey, while spacious and family-oriented, has faced challenges in various safety tests over the years. In particular, its structure and small overlap front test scores have been points of contention.

 

8. Kia Rio

The Rio, a favorite among those seeking economical transportation, has had certain versions fall short in safety assessments. Frontal crash tests and side impact ratings have particularly been areas of concern in previous years.

 

9. Hyundai Accent

Similar to the Rio, the Hyundai Accent, while efficient and cost-effective, has had some models receive mediocre ratings in frontal crash tests. It’s another compact car where size and weight might play a factor in its performance during collisions.

 

10. Ford Mustang

While the Mustang boasts impressive power and iconic design, certain versions of this muscle car have faced challenges in specific safety tests, including the small overlap front test.

 

Factors Contributing to Lower Ratings

When evaluating the safety of vehicles, several considerations come into play:

 

  • Structure and Safety Cage: How well does the vehicle’s design protect its occupants during a collision?
  • Restraints and Kinematics: Are the vehicle’s safety restraints effective in controlling movements during a crash?
  • Safety Features: Does the car include modern safety technologies, such as lane departure warnings or automatic emergency braking?

 

Steering Towards Safer Choices

 

Vehicle safety ratings are a snapshot of a car’s performance under specific, standardized conditions. While they provide essential insights, it’s crucial to remember that real-world conditions can vary. A car’s safety also heavily depends on the driver’s habits, awareness, and decisions.

That said, it’s always advisable for prospective car buyers to conduct thorough research, consult the latest safety ratings, and consider their driving conditions. After all, knowledge is the best tool when seeking a vehicle that offers both convenience and peace of mind.

 

1. Chevrolet Spark

The Chevy Spark, while charming in its compactness, has faced criticism due to its performance in collision tests. Specifically, it has previously earned a lower rating in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) small overlap front test. The small structure and lightweight nature can also put it at a disadvantage in collisions with larger vehicles.

 

2. Fiat 500

Aesthetically pleasing with a retro flair, the Fiat 500 unfortunately didn’t score as impressively in some safety tests. Older models, in particular, faced challenges with side crashworthiness and small overlap front test performance.

 

3. Toyota Tundra

A surprise to many, this powerhouse truck has had its safety debated. Earlier models faced scrutiny due to lower scores in the IIHS roof strength test, raising concerns about the potential risk of rollovers.

 

4. Nissan Versa

This popular subcompact sedan, often chosen for urban commutes, had some of its versions receive less-than-stellar ratings in frontal crash tests, especially in the small overlap front test.

 

5. Jeep Wrangler

While the Jeep Wrangler is touted as a rugged off-roader, its design and lack of some modern safety features have led to critiques. In certain tests, it showed a higher risk for rollovers compared to other SUVs.

 

6. Mitsubishi Mirage

Another entry in the compact category, the Mirage, has faced criticism for its performance in crash tests, particularly frontal crashes. It’s essential to cross-check its safety ratings, especially if you’re considering older models.

 

7. Dodge Journey

The Journey, while spacious and family-oriented, has faced challenges in various safety tests over the years. In particular, its structure and small overlap front test scores have been points of contention.

 

8. Kia Rio

The Rio, a favorite among those seeking economical transportation, has had certain versions fall short in safety assessments. Frontal crash tests and side impact ratings have particularly been areas of concern in previous years.

 

9. Hyundai Accent

Similar to the Rio, the Hyundai Accent, while efficient and cost-effective, has had some models receive mediocre ratings in frontal crash tests. It’s another compact car where size and weight might play a factor in its performance during collisions.

 

10. Ford Mustang

While the Mustang boasts impressive power and iconic design, certain versions of this muscle car have faced challenges in specific safety tests, including the small overlap front test.

 

Factors Contributing to Lower Ratings

When evaluating the safety of vehicles, several considerations come into play:

 

  • Structure and Safety Cage: How well does the vehicle’s design protect its occupants during a collision?
  • Restraints and Kinematics: Are the vehicle’s safety restraints effective in controlling movements during a crash?
  • Safety Features: Does the car include modern safety technologies, such as lane departure warnings or automatic emergency braking?

 

Steering Towards Safer Choices

 

Vehicle safety ratings are a snapshot of a car’s performance under specific, standardized conditions. While they provide essential insights, it’s crucial to remember that real-world conditions can vary. A car’s safety also heavily depends on the driver’s habits, awareness, and decisions.

That said, it’s always advisable for prospective car buyers to conduct thorough research, consult the latest safety ratings, and consider their driving conditions. After all, knowledge is the best tool when seeking a vehicle that offers both convenience and peace of mind.

 

1. Chevrolet Spark

The Chevy Spark, while charming in its compactness, has faced criticism due to its performance in collision tests. Specifically, it has previously earned a lower rating in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) small overlap front test. The small structure and lightweight nature can also put it at a disadvantage in collisions with larger vehicles.

 

2. Fiat 500

Aesthetically pleasing with a retro flair, the Fiat 500 unfortunately didn’t score as impressively in some safety tests. Older models, in particular, faced challenges with side crashworthiness and small overlap front test performance.

 

3. Toyota Tundra

A surprise to many, this powerhouse truck has had its safety debated. Earlier models faced scrutiny due to lower scores in the IIHS roof strength test, raising concerns about the potential risk of rollovers.

 

4. Nissan Versa

This popular subcompact sedan, often chosen for urban commutes, had some of its versions receive less-than-stellar ratings in frontal crash tests, especially in the small overlap front test.

 

5. Jeep Wrangler

While the Jeep Wrangler is touted as a rugged off-roader, its design and lack of some modern safety features have led to critiques. In certain tests, it showed a higher risk for rollovers compared to other SUVs.

 

6. Mitsubishi Mirage

Another entry in the compact category, the Mirage, has faced criticism for its performance in crash tests, particularly frontal crashes. It’s essential to cross-check its safety ratings, especially if you’re considering older models.

 

7. Dodge Journey

The Journey, while spacious and family-oriented, has faced challenges in various safety tests over the years. In particular, its structure and small overlap front test scores have been points of contention.

 

8. Kia Rio

The Rio, a favorite among those seeking economical transportation, has had certain versions fall short in safety assessments. Frontal crash tests and side impact ratings have particularly been areas of concern in previous years.

 

9. Hyundai Accent

Similar to the Rio, the Hyundai Accent, while efficient and cost-effective, has had some models receive mediocre ratings in frontal crash tests. It’s another compact car where size and weight might play a factor in its performance during collisions.

 

10. Ford Mustang

While the Mustang boasts impressive power and iconic design, certain versions of this muscle car have faced challenges in specific safety tests, including the small overlap front test.

 

Factors Contributing to Lower Ratings

When evaluating the safety of vehicles, several considerations come into play:

 

  • Structure and Safety Cage: How well does the vehicle’s design protect its occupants during a collision?
  • Restraints and Kinematics: Are the vehicle’s safety restraints effective in controlling movements during a crash?
  • Safety Features: Does the car include modern safety technologies, such as lane departure warnings or automatic emergency braking?

 

Steering Towards Safer Choices

 

Vehicle safety ratings are a snapshot of a car’s performance under specific, standardized conditions. While they provide essential insights, it’s crucial to remember that real-world conditions can vary. A car’s safety also heavily depends on the driver’s habits, awareness, and decisions.

That said, it’s always advisable for prospective car buyers to conduct thorough research, consult the latest safety ratings, and consider their driving conditions. After all, knowledge is the best tool when seeking a vehicle that offers both convenience and peace of mind.

Get Approved Today

See if you qualify in under 60 seconds

Get Approved Today

See if you qualify in under 60 seconds